Talk:MOS naming: Difference between revisions
/ "Perfect", "augmented" and "diminished" for generic MOS intervals / |
Re |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
: In any case, I would recommend specifying that these intervals names be ''co-official with the harmonic maj/min/aug/dim/#/b''. They can be regular or inverted depending on MOS pattern, since the two systems have separate objectives. | : In any case, I would recommend specifying that these intervals names be ''co-official with the harmonic maj/min/aug/dim/#/b''. They can be regular or inverted depending on MOS pattern, since the two systems have separate objectives. | ||
: As a side note on diamond MOS, have you thought about using ''+ and -'' (as in A+ B-) instead of ''& and @''? I find the current system very indistinct for inline text and difficult to follow. [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 17:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | : As a side note on diamond MOS, have you thought about using ''+ and -'' (as in A+ B-) instead of ''& and @''? I find the current system very indistinct for inline text and difficult to follow. [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 17:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: I do find "enlarged" and "reduced" appealing. | |||
:: The & and @ are supposed to be accidentals that are readable on a staff (when stylized) and distinct enough. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 17:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | |||