User talk:FloraC/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 14:

: Now I see that I already planned to change [[Template:Primes in edo]] accordingly: see [[User:Xenwolf/Fifthspan#Separate mod steps]] (second table) with the linked "[[patent val]]". If EDOs with notable non-patent vals will ''develop'' a section about that fact and if on, the other hand, also EDO pages will start with the prime iontervals table (I see a tendency toward this), we will see the relation between EDOs, vals and temperaments optimally represented in the wiki. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 08:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:: So new template for sure, but where will it be linked to? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

::: Maybe in a way like this: <code><nowiki>[[Val|Vals]]: [[24edo#Vals|24p]], [[135edo#Vals|135p]], [[159edo|159]], [[183edo|183]], </nowiki></code> etc.? Or maybe better with <code><nowiki>[[Val|EDO vals]]:</nowiki></code> before the list? However, it seems to me that the val article we want to link to doesn't really welcome newbies, this is especially true for the "defining" section: ''A val is a map? representing(?) how to (view the intervals)? in a (single(?) chain)? of generators? as the tempered? versions of intervals in just intonation(?)'' ...I tried to give an impression of the known-to-unknown ratio in the first sentence. This is what I hate about the writing style of mathematicians: you are given the impression that you have to know all the parts of a concept before you can understand any one of them. So there is still something to do. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 : Now I see that I already planned to change [[Template:Primes in edo]] accordingly: see [[User:Xenwolf/Fifthspan#Separate mod steps]] (second table) with the linked "[[patent val]]". If EDOs with notable non-patent vals will ''develop'' a section about that fact and if on, the other hand, also EDO pages will start with the prime iontervals table (I see a tendency toward this), we will see the relation between EDOs, vals and temperaments optimally represented in the wiki. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 08:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
+:: So new template for sure, but where will it be linked to? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
+::: Maybe in a way like this: <code><nowiki>[[Val|Vals]]: [[24edo#Vals|24p]], [[135edo#Vals|135p]], [[159edo|159]], [[183edo|183]], </nowiki></code> etc.? <br> Or maybe better with <code><nowiki>[[Val|EDO vals]]:</nowiki></code> before the list? <br> However, it seems to me that the val article we want to link to doesn't really welcome newbies, this is especially true for the "defining" section: <br>''A val is a <u>map</u><sup>?</sup> <u>representing</u><sup><sup>(?)</sup></sup> how to (<u>view</u> the intervals)<sup>?</sup> in a (<u>single</u><sup><sup>(?)</sup></sup> <u>chain</u>)<sup>?</sup> of <u>generators</u><sup>?</sup> as the <u>tempered</u><sup>?</sup> versions of intervals in <u>just intonation</u><sup><sup>(?)</sup></sup>'' <br> ...I tried to give an impression of the known-to-unknown ratio in the first sentence. This is what I hate about the writing style of mathematicians: you are given the impression that you have to know all the parts of a concept before you can understand any one of them. <br> So there is still something to do. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)