Talk:72edo: Difference between revisions

(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 9:

:: I like the way you guys didn't write out ratios of many many digits. I would go further and only include ratios of 3 or 4 digits or less. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 00:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

::: Are you talking about the number of digits in total? Sorry, but most commas have ratios of at least three digits per single side of the ratio, so that would be unreasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

::: Are you talking about the number of digits in total- as in throughout the whole ratio? Sorry, but most commas that are well known have ratios of at least three digits per single side of the ratio, so that would be unreasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

:::: Not the total number of digits, just the number of digits in the numerator. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 20:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

::::: In my opinion also a 8-digit (or <abbr title="9-digits would be better, in this case the numerator would start with 1 anyway">9-digit</abbr>) limit would look good in the comma table. See [[41edo#Commas]] for an example. The 10-digit limit was also in use for naming interval pages and redirect lemmas to them. Maybe also this could be changed? BTW: I think for finding a new consensus, we should move this discussion to a better place. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::: I like what you did with the 41edo table, --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 22:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

: I heard these tables are generated by scala, aren't they? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

:: Yes it seems so to me, I also darkly remember reading that somewhere. But I'd like to understand the criteria without looking at scale. Do you see chances to get there? BTW: I have scala installed, I tried to get this list but with no success so far. If anyone knows scala, please help! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

::: You read that in [[50edo]]: ''This list is not all-inclusive, and is based on the interval table from Scala version 2.2. '' Seems the criteria is simply the presence in the interval table. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :: I like the way you guys didn't write out ratios of many many digits. I would go further and only include ratios of 3 or 4 digits or less. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 00:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
-::: Are you talking about the number of digits in total?  Sorry, but most commas have ratios of at least three digits per single side of the ratio, so that would be unreasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+::: Are you talking about the number of digits in total- as in throughout the whole ratio?  Sorry, but most commas that are well known have ratios of at least three digits per single side of the ratio, so that would be unreasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::: Not the total number of digits, just the number of digits in the numerator. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 20:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+::::: In my opinion also a 8-digit (or <abbr title="9-digits would be better, in this case the numerator would start with 1 anyway">9-digit</abbr>) limit would look good in the comma table. See [[41edo#Commas]] for an example. The 10-digit limit was also in use for naming interval pages and redirect lemmas to them. Maybe also this could be changed? BTW: I think for finding a new consensus, we should move this discussion to a better place. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::: I like what you did with the 41edo table, --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 22:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
+: I heard these tables are generated by scala, aren't they? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+:: Yes it seems so to me, I also darkly remember reading that somewhere. But I'd like to understand the criteria without looking at scale. Do you see chances to get there? BTW: I have scala installed, I tried to get this list but with no success so far. If anyone knows scala, please help! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+::: You read that in [[50edo]]: ''This list is not all-inclusive, and is based on the interval table from Scala version 2.2. '' Seems the criteria is simply the presence in the interval table. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)