Talk:Kleismic: Difference between revisions
→Linking subgroups: new section |
Re |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Linking subgroups == | == Linking subgroups == | ||
Suppose that a subgroup appears in the text of a page, in this case the 2.3.5.13-subgroup. By {{W|MOS:SEAOFBLUE}}, there shouldn't be two consecutive links, since that would appear as a single link. Using <code><nowiki>[[2.3.5.13 subgroup|2.3.5.13]]<nowiki/>-[[subgroup]]</nowiki></code> produces: | Suppose that a subgroup appears in the text of a page, in this case the 2.3.5.13-subgroup. By {{W|MOS:SEAOFBLUE}}, there shouldn't be two consecutive links, since that would appear as a single link. Using <code><nowiki>[[2.3.5.13 subgroup|2.3.5.13]]<nowiki/>-[[subgroup]]</nowiki></code> produces: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
Is this the best way, or is there a better alternative? --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 04:31, 26 March 2026 (UTC) | Is this the best way, or is there a better alternative? --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 04:31, 26 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
: I don't think we can stick to MOS: SEAOFBLUE on our wiki, and not sure if it's even worth trying. That said, the best practice seems to be linking to the subgroup article as a whole: <code><nowiki>[[2.3.5.13 subgroup|2.3.5.13-subgroup]]</nowiki></code>, provided the article exists. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:36, 26 March 2026 (UTC) | |||