Talk:Tenney–Euclidean metrics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:::: Hopefully [https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki/permalink/3046365965629387/ Mike's FB post] answers part of this (hopefully this link works too). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | :::: Hopefully [https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki/permalink/3046365965629387/ Mike's FB post] answers part of this (hopefully this link works too). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Formulas vs. intuition == | |||
Put intuition first, formulas second. This is exactly the problem with the page that I wanted to fix by adding the intuition in the first place, and you've just brought it back. | |||
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 09:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
: The wiki can have tutorials but isn't a tutorial to begin with. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
:: I'm not asking for tutorials. I'm asking for THE INTUITION TO BE PUT FIRST. I don't want to wade through mathslop to get to the actual relevant explanations. | |||
:: Especially if people are coming here from pages like [[hobbit]]. You don't call something "Euclidean" and not put the geometric intuition first. | |||
:: -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 23:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
::: I was saying interpretation-first is more of a writing style of textbooks/tutorials, which this wiki is not. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::: Well, maybe we need to rethink what the wiki should be. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 21:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC) | |||