Template talk:Infobox regtemp: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TallKite (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
:: Imo these should simply be ''ET join'' and always use wart notation whenever the formal equave is a prime harmonic e.g. mintaka is b5 & b17 (''not'' *5 & 17). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
== Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm ==
Make this infobox not completely break if you don't supply the precise "reduced mapping" format it wants, because I can't understand the [[Reduced mapping]] page and am not figuring allat out and it's probably the main thing that's been putting me off adding these infoboxes.
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 06:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
: I find the reduced mapping to be very useful. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 00:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Return to "Infobox regtemp" page.