Xenharmonic Wiki

Talk:Step pattern product: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, Sysops
1,399 edits
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Fredg999 (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops
6,129 edits
m Fredg999 moved page Talk:Scale pattern product to Talk:Step pattern product without leaving a redirect: Use "step pattern" instead of "scale pattern"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
 
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
 
----
 
== Are Fokker blocks product words? ==
"The importance of product words in music theory is that every Fokker block can be expressed as the product word of two or more distributionally even scales in a unique way. Fokker blocks are therefore equivalent to product words of DE scales of the same size."
 
That a Fokker block is a product work does not entail a product word of DE scales of the same size is a Fokker block. Is it?
 
- '''genewardsmith''' November 14, 2011, 04:37:21 PM UTC-0800
----
Yes. That's the main result of the Zabka article. A scale is a strictly epimorphic (monotonic) Fokker block if and only if it is the product word of two DE scales.
 
- '''keenanpepper''' November 14, 2011, 08:24:42 PM UTC-0800
----
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Step_pattern_product"
Return to "Step pattern product" page.