Talk:19edo: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>FREEZE No edit summary |
|||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | {{High priority}}{{clear}} | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | |||
---- | __TOC__ | ||
== Percentage precision == | |||
I like the percentages in the Errors table, but I think showing hundredths of a percentage point gives the reader far too much information. I would prefer to see 0%, -11%, -12%, -34%, +27%, -31%. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 05:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
: I agree in this. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: I'd still like to have one decimal place. It's a convenient way to check whether an interval is consistent. Here's a case where you can't with such precision. 15/11 in 19edo: -27-(-11-12)% = -50%. An additional decimal place practically keeps such occurence away. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
It's a | |||
- ''' | == Page name change == | ||
I see that [[User:Xenwolf]] has moved this article from "19edo" to "19-EDO". The same happened to the 12edo page, and possibly others. But this change is not consistent at all across pages. The justification for this change was that it's more common to write it this way, but in practice I've seen "Nedo" far more than "N-EDO". But my perspective as a Discord user could be limiting me there. "EDO is actually an abbreviation and the number in front of it can be grasped at a glance" is the other reason given, which I don't think is sound when the acronym is explained right in the header. I would like to hear more of a reason why Xenwolf did this, and whether any other people were involved. --[[User:SupahstarSaga]] | |||
: Working on this wiki for more than 10 years, I'm well aware that around 1000 pages follow the <code>''n''edo</code> pattern. What I'm trying to do is improve the accessibility to public readers (people that come from search engines or Wikipedia). What I think should be secondary is if it's comfortable for people who already know what this all is about. Please join the discussion under [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions #EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos)]]. (BTW maybe <code>''n''-edo</code> could be a solution that fits all?) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
- | == "Bad-tasted edit" == | ||
- | ???? How was rewriting the 19edo theory section "bad-tasted"? I just wanted to rewrite that section to be consistent with the way I explained tunings like 5edo and 7edo. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC) | ||
- '' | : I haven't had time to review your 5- and 7edo edits, so I can't comment on that. But these edo pages aren't your playground. Pls respect existing materials and work from there instead of starting from the ground up. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC) | ||