Talk:27edo: Difference between revisions
Created page with "== 6L 1s notation == What's that and why is 27edo suitable for such a notation? ~~~~" |
Undo revision 195686 by ArrowHead294 (talk). Pls check Sintel's list of top pages and use this template according to that Tag: Undo |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== 6L 1s notation == | == 6L 1s notation == | ||
What's that and why is 27edo suitable for such a notation? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | What's that and why is 27edo suitable for such a notation? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Using Tetracot as the base for notation rather than Superpyth. Since that's the closest thing to an even heptatonic scale here and the sharps/flats don't cross over each other the way superpyth ones do, it removes the instances where notes can look like they're moving in the wrong direction on a stave. (ie, going from D# to Eb, etc.) I did it in 20edo because that works even more poorly with the traditional diatonic set of accidentals and it looks like Compactstar has copied the idea here. [[User:Yourmusic Productions|Yourmusic Productions]] ([[User talk:Yourmusic Productions|talk]]) 07:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | |||