Height: Difference between revisions
Explain what this "equivalence class" would commonly be |
equivalence section: no need to talk about p-adic valuations here |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''height''' is a mathematical tool to measure the [[complexity]] of [[JI]] [[interval]]s. | The '''height''' is a mathematical tool to measure the [[complexity]] of [[JI]] [[interval]]s. | ||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||
A '''height''' is a function on members of an algebraically defined object which maps elements to real numbers, yielding a type of complexity measurement (see [[Wikipedia: Height function]]). For example we can assign each element of the positive rational numbers a height, and hence a complexity. While there is no consensus on the restrictions of a height, we will attempt to create a definition for positive rational numbers which is practical for musical purposes. | A '''height''' is a function on members of an algebraically defined object which maps elements to real numbers, yielding a type of complexity measurement (see [[Wikipedia: Height function]]). For example we can assign each element of the positive rational numbers a height, and hence a complexity. While there is no consensus on the restrictions of a height, we will attempt to create a definition for positive rational numbers which is practical for musical purposes. | ||
Line 19: | Line 16: | ||
<math>\displaystyle H \left( {q} \right) \equiv F \left( {H} \left( {q} \right) \right)</math> | <math>\displaystyle H \left( {q} \right) \equiv F \left( {H} \left( {q} \right) \right)</math> | ||
Exponentiation and logarithm are such functions commonly used for converting a height between | Exponentiation and logarithm are such functions commonly used for converting a height between arithmetic and logarithmic scales. | ||
A '''semi-height''' is a function which does not obey criterion #3 above, so that there is a rational number ''q'' ≠ 1 such that H(''q'') = H(1), resulting in an equivalence relation on its elements, under which #1 is modified to a finite number of equivalence classes. An example would be [[octave equivalence]], where two ratios ''q''<sub>1</sub> and ''q''<sub>2</sub> are considered equivalent if they differ only by factors of 2. | |||
We can also consider other equivalences. For example, we can assume tritave equivalence by ignoring factors of 3. | |||
== Height versus norm == | |||
Height functions are applied to ratios, whereas norms are measurements on interval lattices [[wikipedia: embedding|embedded]] in [[wikipedia: Normed vector space|normed vector spaces]]. Some height functions are essentially norms, and they are numerically equal. For example, the [[Tenney height]] is also the Tenney norm. | |||
However, not all height functions are norms, and not all norms are height functions. The [[Benedetti height]] is not a norm, since it does not satisfy the condition of absolute homogeneity. The [[taxicab distance]] is not a height, since there can be infinitely many intervals below a given bound. | |||
== Examples of height functions == | == Examples of height functions == | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
! Name | ! Name | ||
Line 55: | Line 43: | ||
| Height | | Height | ||
| <math>\text{sopfr}(n d)</math> | | <math>\text{sopfr}(n d)</math> | ||
| <math>2^{\large{\text{sopfr}( | | <math>2^{\large{\text{sopfr}(q)}}</math> | ||
| <math>\text{sopfr}(q)</math> | | <math>\text{sopfr}(q)</math> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 93: | Line 81: | ||
Height functions can also be put on the points of [http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/QuasiProjectiveVariety.html projective varieties]. Since [[abstract regular temperament]]s can be identified with rational points on [[Wikipedia: Grassmannian|Grassmann varieties]], complexity measures of regular temperaments are also height functions. | Height functions can also be put on the points of [http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/QuasiProjectiveVariety.html projective varieties]. Since [[abstract regular temperament]]s can be identified with rational points on [[Wikipedia: Grassmannian|Grassmann varieties]], complexity measures of regular temperaments are also height functions. | ||
See [[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT/Alternative complexities]] for an extensive discussion of heights and semi-heights used in regular temperament theory. | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
The concept of height was introduced to xenharmonics by [[Gene Ward Smith]] in 2001<ref>[https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_31418#31488 Yahoo! Tuning Group | ''Super Particular Stepsize'']</ref>; it comes from the mathematical field of number theory (for more information, see [[Wikipedia: Height function]]). It is not to be confused with the musical notion of [[Wikipedia: Pitch (music) #Theories of pitch perception|''pitch height'' (as opposed to ''pitch chroma'')]]<ref>Though it has also been used to refer to the size of an interval in cents. On page 23 of [https://www.plainsound.org/pdfs/JC&ToH.pdf ''John Cage and the Theor of Harmony''], Tenney writes: "The one-dimensional continuum of pitch-height (i.e. 'pitch' as ordinarily defined)", and graphs it ''as opposed to'' his concept of "harmonic distance", which was ironically the first measurement named by Gene Ward Smith as a "height": "Tenney height".</ref>. | The concept of height was introduced to xenharmonics by [[Gene Ward Smith]] in 2001<ref>[https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_31418#31488 Yahoo! Tuning Group | ''Super Particular Stepsize'']</ref>; it comes from the mathematical field of number theory (for more information, see [[Wikipedia: Height function]]). It is not to be confused with the musical notion of [[Wikipedia: Pitch (music) #Theories of pitch perception|''pitch height'' (as opposed to ''pitch chroma'')]]<ref>Though it has also been used to refer to the size of an interval in cents. On page 23 of [https://www.plainsound.org/pdfs/JC&ToH.pdf ''John Cage and the Theor of Harmony''], Tenney writes: "The one-dimensional continuum of pitch-height (i.e. 'pitch' as ordinarily defined)", and graphs it ''as opposed to'' his concept of "harmonic distance", which was ironically the first measurement named by Gene Ward Smith as a "height": "Tenney height".</ref>. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Commas by taxicab distance]] | * [[Commas by taxicab distance]] | ||
* [[Harmonic entropy]] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 106: | Line 95: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Math]] | [[Category:Math]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Interval complexity measures]] |