Talk:Interior product: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) correct table heading formatting |
Notation again |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
a ∧ b | a ∧ b | ||
!regressive product (AKA vee product)<br> | !regressive product (AKA vee product)<br> | ||
a ∨ b | a ∨ b = <nowiki>*</nowiki>(*a ∧ *b) | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>(*a ∧ *b) | |||
!right interior product<br> | !right interior product<br> | ||
a ⨽ b | a ⨽ b = ∗(∗a ∧ b)<br> | ||
∗(∗a ∧ b)<br> | |||
examples given where grade(a) ≥ grade(b) | examples given where grade(a) ≥ grade(b) | ||
!(left) interior product<br> | !(left) interior product<br> | ||
a ⨼ b | a ⨼ b = <nowiki>*</nowiki>(a ∧ *b)<br> | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>(a ∧ *b)<br> | |||
examples given where grade(a) < grade(b) | examples given where grade(a) < grade(b) | ||
!symmetrical interior product<br> | !symmetrical interior product<br> | ||
| Line 168: | Line 165: | ||
|(in terms of other two interior products) | |(in terms of other two interior products) | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Notation == | |||
As Cmloegcmluin observes above, the <math>\vee</math> notation is not really standard, and this product is usually written as <math>\alpha \mathbin{\lrcorner} \beta</math>. | |||
That is is 'dual' to the wedge product is too vague (there are at least 3 different notions of duality here). One might say it's the adjoint of the wedge product, as <math>\left\langle \alpha \mathbin{\lrcorner} \gamma , \beta \right\rangle = \left\langle \alpha , \beta \wedge \gamma\right\rangle</math>. | |||
So my suggestion is to just use the standard notation. | |||
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC) | |||