Talk:Breed: Difference between revisions

Line 29:

::: Another understanding in terminology that I hold but you might differ is that a tuning map is a val becuz (1) a val is a synonym of a map, as you proposed, and (2) a tuning map is a map. Following that, a val doesn't need to represent an equal temp, but a breed always does. So that is a greater distinction between a val and a breed and so practicality isn't the entire point of making the distinction. I'm very interested in what you think of this point here. Thanks in advance. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

:::: When I said {{val| 1 0 -4 }} isn't a breed, I understood that there was no mathematical objectivity to that classification, and didn't mean to imply that there was any. It occurs to me that I've been assuming a standard (prime-limit) domain basis, and that with a well-crafted domain basis, any map could be made into a reasonable ET.

:::: I don't have a source ready to back up what I said and don't have time or energy to find one. I was just trying to help someone on the wiki but I don't care enough about this issue to debate anyone about it. Sorry.

:::: I will stick with using "map", which defaults to meaning "temperament map", where I only need to use the word "temperament" when I need to disambiguate with other types of maps such as "tuning maps". I don't use "breed" in my own work, but I will stick to assuming it means a map which appears to be for a practical ET. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 21:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ::: Another understanding in terminology that I hold but you might differ is that a tuning map is a val becuz (1) a val is a synonym of a map, as you proposed, and (2) a tuning map is a map. Following that, a val doesn't need to represent an equal temp, but a breed always does. So that is a greater distinction between a val and a breed and so practicality isn't the entire point of making the distinction. I'm very interested in what you think of this point here. Thanks in advance. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
+:::: When I said {{val| 1 0 -4 }} isn't a breed, I understood that there was no mathematical objectivity to that classification, and didn't mean to imply that there was any. It occurs to me that I've been assuming a standard (prime-limit) domain basis, and that with a well-crafted domain basis, any map could be made into a reasonable ET.
+:::: I don't have a source ready to back up what I said and don't have time or energy to find one. I was just trying to help someone on the wiki but I don't care enough about this issue to debate anyone about it. Sorry.
+:::: I will stick with using "map", which defaults to meaning "temperament map", where I only need to use the word "temperament" when I need to disambiguate with other types of maps such as "tuning maps". I don't use "breed" in my own work, but I will stick to assuming it means a map which appears to be for a practical ET. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 21:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)