Talk:Kite's color notation: Difference between revisions
| Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
:: As a longtime fan of Color Notation, I vouch for the "fo/so" version of this proposal. | :: As a longtime fan of Color Notation, I vouch for the "fo/so" version of this proposal. | ||
:: I also think "ha/ba" is a decent enough replacement for the "la/sa" pair. It uses consonants no color uses, it's derived from italian "alta/bassa" (except with "h" added for a consonant, also invoking "high") which refers to both sets' fifth-shift and pitch relative to the Central row. I won't get to check for conflicts with "b" as the flat sign nor "8va/8vb" for a while, however. [[User:Kaiveran|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran|talk]]) 02:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC) | :: I also think "ha/ba" is a decent enough replacement for the "la/sa" pair. It uses consonants no color uses, it's derived from italian "alta/bassa" (except with "h" added for a consonant, also invoking "high") which refers to both sets' fifth-shift and pitch relative to the Central row. I won't get to check for conflicts with "b" as the flat sign nor "8va/8vb" for a while, however. [[User:Kaiveran|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran|talk]]) 02:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: Sawa 2nd becomes bw2, which looks like a flat wa 2nd. IMO a little too confusing. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 10:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||