ELD: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
fix section capitalization
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
Examples: update row headers per agreement at https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:APS
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''ELD''', or '''equal length division''', is a kind of [[Arithmetic tunings|arithmetic]] and [[Harmonotonic tunings|harmonotonic]] tuning.
An '''ELD''' ('''equal length division'''), '''ALD''' ('''arithmetic length division'''), or '''IFD''' ('''inverse-arithmetic frequency division'''), is an [[Arithmetic tunings|arithmetic]] and [[period]]ic [[tuning]] in which each period is divided to a number of steps of equal length difference.  


== Specification ==
== Specification ==


Its full specification is n-ELDp: n equal length divisions of the irrational interval p.  
Its full specification is ''n''-ELD-''p'' (''n'' equal length divisions of ''p''), or ''n''-ALD-''p'' (''n'' arithmetic length divisions of ''p''), or ''n''-IFD-''p'' (''n'' inverse-arithmetic frequency division of ''p'').  


== Formula ==
== Formula ==


To find the steps for an n-ELDp, begin by recognizing that while the ratio between your root pitch's string length and the length you would pluck to get the lowest pitch is <span><math>p</math></span> (or <span><math>\frac p1</math></span>), if you are going to move arithmetically (by repeated addition) from <span><math>1</math></span> to <span><math>p</math></span>, then the difference in string length that you need to cover is not actually <span><math>p</math></span>, but only <span><math>p - 1</math></span>. And because you are dividing it into <span><math>n</math></span> parts, each step will have a size of <span><math>\frac{p-1}{n}</math></span>. So, the formula for the length of step <span><math>k</math></span> of an n-ELDp is:
To find the steps for an ''n''-ELD-''p'', begin by recognizing that while the ratio between your root pitch's string length and the length you would pluck to get the lowest pitch is <span><math>p</math></span> (or <span><math>\frac p1</math></span>), if you are going to move arithmetically (by repeated addition) from <span><math>1</math></span> to <span><math>p</math></span>, then the difference in string length that you need to cover is not actually <span><math>p</math></span>, but only <span><math>p - 1</math></span>. And because you are dividing it into <span><math>n</math></span> parts, each step will have a size of <span><math>\frac{p-1}{n}</math></span>. So, the formula for the length of step <span><math>k</math></span> of an n-ELDp is:


<math>
<math>
Line 27: Line 27:
=== Vs. UD ===
=== Vs. UD ===


The only difference between an n-ELDp and an [[UD|n-UDp (or utonal division)]] is that the p for a utonal division is rational.
An [[UD|''n''-UD-''p'' (or utonal division)]] is equivalent to an ''n''-ELD-''p'' except that the period ''p'' of the UD must be rational.


=== Vs. EFD ===
=== Vs. EFD ===
Line 35: Line 35:
=== Vs. ALS ===
=== Vs. ALS ===


An ELD will be equivalent to some [[ALS|ALS (arithmetic length sequence)]]; specifically n-ELD((p-1)/n) = n-ALSp.
One period of an ELD will be equivalent to some [[ALS|ALS (arithmetic length sequence)]]; specifically ''n''-ELD((''p'' - 1)/''n'') = ''n''-ALS-''p''.


=== Vs. EDL ===
=== Vs. EDL ===
Line 54: Line 54:
! 4
! 4
|-
|-
! frequency (f)
! frequency (''f'', ratio)
|(1)
|(1)
|1.11
|1.11
Line 61: Line 61:
|-
|-
! pitch (log₂f)
! pitch (log₂''f'', octaves)
|(0)
|(0)
|0.14
|0.14
Line 68: Line 68:
|0.69
|0.69
|-
|-
! length (1/f)
! length (1/''f'', ratio)
|(1)
|(1)
|0.90
|0.90
Line 86: Line 86:
! 4
! 4
|-
|-
! frequency (f)
! frequency (''f'', ratio)
|(1)
|(1)
|0.87
|0.87
Line 93: Line 93:
|1/φ
|1/φ
|-
|-
! pitch (log₂f)
! pitch (log₂''f'', octaves)
|(0)
|(0)
| -0.21
| -0.21
Line 100: Line 100:
| -0.69
| -0.69
|-
|-
! length (1/f)
! length (1/''f'', ratio)
|(1+(0/4)(φ-1)) = (0φ + 4)/4 = 1
|(1+(0/4)(φ-1)) = (0φ + 4)/4 = 1
|1+(1/4)(φ-1) = (1φ + 3)/4
|1+(1/4)(φ-1) = (1φ + 3)/4
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/ELD"