Talk:Ainismic chords: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m FloraC moved page Talk:Ainic chords to Talk:Ainismic chords without leaving a redirect: Follow the name change |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this type of essentially tempered chord into two classes based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC) | Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this type of essentially tempered chord into two classes based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
Hmm, looking at the article on [[Keenanismic chords]], it says more chords exist if you're willing to go to higher odd limits, so perhaps dividing the ainic chords into two classes like this is unnecessary... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC) | |||