View source for Talk:5/4

{{WSArchiveLink}}

== "classic" misleading ==

To me it seems we'd better name it "just major third". The word "classic" is so closely related to [[wikipedia:classical music|Classical music]] that it suggests 4\12 or some meantone variant. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

: We could instead add one ore more of: "octave-reduced 5th harmonic", "harmonic third", "natural third" ... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

:# Dave Keenan used "classic" to refer to 5-limit as opposed to "Pythgorean", though he did say it may be omitted for the simplest ratio in the class. I see it reasonable. 
:# Suppose we change this to "just major third", what about [[8/5]], [[5/3]], [[6/5]], [[16/15]], [[25/24]] and others? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

:: I now think that '''classic''' and '''just''' are not unambiguous in our context (they are in themselves much more evaluative than meaningful). And yes, you are absolute right about (2)! What if we add '''just''' after '''classic''' for now and wait for responses? ... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 11:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

::: I'm absolutely okay with that. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

:::: Not going to lie, I actually like the name "Classic Diatonic Major Third" when referring to 5/4, namely because of the contrast with Pythagorean intervals. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 12:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

::::: This is why I love the decision of using the ratio as page titles for interval pages: there is no doubt about the interval, only about the name, sometimes.😉
::::: I'd say it's most probably a major third. In my opinion, the word "diatonic" does not add anything significant to the name (see wikipedia:Diatonic scale and wikipedia:Diatonic and chromatic), concerning "classic" see above. But I know and respect the central role of diatonic (if I got that right) in your theory, Aura. Of course, even "Major" and "third" are disputable, but in the interest of our readers, I think it is important that a few basic terms from outside are also used here, and in a way that is not too shocking at first.