User talk:Cmloegcmluin/APS

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Periodicity and infiniteness?

By "if not provided, the sequence is open-ended" it seems to suggest that systems in this category are finite and aperiodic when n is provided. By "n-EPD-x = n-APS-(x/n)" it seems to suggest that this tuning system is infinite and periodic just as equal multiplications. Which one is intended? FloraC (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Great catch. The intention was that they are finite and aperiodic when n is provided. So they are only equivalent to a single period of a EPD. I have corrected accordingly (and the similar statements on the ALS and AFS pages). Thank you. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 18:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Vagueness in the spec

> "The pitch of the k-th step of an APS-p is quite simply kp."

That implies p must be a pitch relation (i.e. log-frequency relation), such as cents or octaves.

> n-EPD-p = APS(p/n)

That is also true only if p is a pitch relation. I've tried to clarify this matter in the lastest changes.

However, in "APS⁴√2" and "APS1.189" the numbers are frequency ratios. Using pitches it should be APS(300 ¢), APS(1/4 oct), or APS(1\4). I think there are two ways to specify the tuning, one by frequency ratio, the other by pitch relations. It can work without confusion, cuz obviously frequency ratio is dimensionless, whereas pitch relations never go without a unit.

FloraC (talk) 10:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

How to use the example table

I'm much confused by the table in the "examples" section. The first row is labeled "frequency (f)", whose entries are 1, 1.19, 1.41, 1.68, 2, and that's perfectly clear to me. Now the second row is labeled "pitch (log2f)", and the entries, in terms of contents, are identical to those in the first row. So I wondered, maybe these are the f which should be plugged to log2f? That gives you the correct pitch relations. But interpreting them this way leads to inconsistent results in the third row. The entries in this row are 1, 0.84, 0.71, 0.59, 0.5, which are clearly lengths, and not meant to be the f as is plugged to 1/f.

I suggest the following changes:

  • frequency → frequency ratio
  • pitch → size
  • length → length ratio

And then the "step size" row can show the pitch relations, that is, 0/4 oct, 1/4 oct, 2/4 oct, 3/4 oct, 4/4 oct.

FloraC (talk) 11:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)