Fractional-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
Line 272: | Line 272: | ||
Badness: 0.052475 | Badness: 0.052475 | ||
== 44th-octave temperaments | == 44th-octave temperaments == | ||
One step of 44edo is very close to the septimal comma, [[64/63]]. The relationship is preserved even up thousands of EDOs. | One step of 44edo is very close to the septimal comma, [[64/63]]. The relationship is preserved even up thousands of EDOs. | ||
Line 288: | Line 288: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.942 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.942 | ||
Vals: {{EDOs|1848, 2684}}, ... | Vals: 836, 1012, 1672, {{EDOs|1848, 2684}}, 2860, 3696, 4532, 5368, ... | ||
=== 11-limit === | === 11-limit === | ||
Line 301: | Line 301: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.943 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.943 | ||
Vals: 1848, 2684, ... | Vals: 176, 836, 1012, 1672, 1848, 2684, 2860, 3696, 4532... | ||
=== 13-limit === | === 13-limit === | ||
Line 312: | Line 312: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.939 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.939 | ||
Vals: 1848, 2684, ... | Vals: 836, 1012f, 1672f, {{EDOs|1848, 2684}}, 3696f, 4532, 5368, 7216... | ||
== 56th-octave temperaments == | == 56th-octave temperaments == |