Support: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
The "nontechnically-speaking sense" wasn't equivalent to the "technically-speaking sense" given just below, and not much less technical anyway. Implement an actually nontechnically-speaking explanation
Line 5: Line 5:
== Generalization ==
== Generalization ==


An equal temperament is the same thing as a rank-1 temperament, and the initial definition given here where the supporting temperament is rank-1 is by far the most common use case. However, in general, we can say that any lower-[[nullity]] (higher-[[rank]]) temperament is supported by a higher-nullity (lower-rank) temperament if the lower-nullity temperament's [[comma basis]] is a subset of the higher-nullity temperament's<ref>This is an edge case, but a temperament should have at least one comma to satisfy this definition; [[JI]] may be conceptualized as a temperament where nothing is tempered out, but clearly it would be silly to say that any temperament "supports" JI.</ref><ref>Example uses of this sense can be found on the following pages: [[Subgroup Temperament Families, Relationships, and Genes#Support]], [[Meet and join#Intra-Subgroup Temperament Meet and Join]], and [[Interior product#Applications]].</ref>. Technically speaking, we'd say that the lower-nullity temperament's comma space is a [[subspace]] of the higher-nullity temperament's comma space.
An equal temperament is the same thing as a rank-1 temperament, and the initial definition given here where the supporting temperament is rank-1 is by far the most common use case. However, in general, we can say that any lower-[[nullity]] (higher-[[rank]]) temperament is supported by a higher-nullity (lower-rank) temperament if the lower-nullity temperament tempers out all the commas the higher-nullity temperament does<ref>This is an edge case, but a temperament should have at least one comma to satisfy this definition; [[JI]] may be conceptualized as a temperament where nothing is tempered out, but clearly it would be silly to say that any temperament "supports" JI.</ref><ref>Example uses of this sense can be found on the following pages: [[Subgroup Temperament Families, Relationships, and Genes #Support]], [[Meet and join #Intra-Subgroup Temperament Meet and Join]], and [[Interior product #Applications]].</ref>. Technically speaking, we would say that the lower-nullity temperament's comma space is a [[subspace]] of the higher-nullity temperament's comma space.


An equivalent generalized definition of "support" would be to say that the lower-''rank'' temperament's ''[[mapping]]'' is a subset of the higher-''rank'' temperament's ''mapping''. In this case, the technical definition would be that the lower-rank temperament's mapping-row space is a subspace of the higher-rank temperament's mapping-row space. Another way to say this is that one can find forms of the mappings for these two temperaments where the higher-rank mapping is identical to the lower-rank mapping but with additional mapping rows. To use the 22-ET and pajara example above, we can see that pajara has a mapping form {{ket|{{map|12 19 28 34}} {{map|22 35 51 62}}}}, which contains 22-ET {{map|22 35 51 62}} as its second row.
An equivalent generalized definition of "support" would be to say that the lower-''rank'' temperament's maps all intervals the same way as the higher-''rank'' temperament does. In this case, the technical definition would be that the lower-rank temperament's mapping-row space is a subspace of the higher-rank temperament's mapping-row space. Another way to say this is that one can find forms of the mappings for these two temperaments where the higher-rank mapping is identical to the lower-rank mapping but with additional mapping rows. To use the 22-ET and pajara example above, we can see that pajara has a mapping form {{ket|{{map|12 19 28 34}} {{map|22 35 51 62}}}}, which contains 22-ET {{map|22 35 51 62}} as its second row.


== Other informal definition ==
== Other informal definition ==