Talk:Height: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:56, 11 April 2022 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:29, 12 April 2022 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Height is not dissonance: re Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:: Agreed. As far as I can tell, "height" and "complexity" are synonymous. If they're not, then it may be a good idea to explain the difference on the page. I don't understand what the motivation is for using the term "height" when we already have the descriptive and in-common-use term "complexity". --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)		:: Agreed. As far as I can tell, "height" and "complexity" are synonymous. If they're not, then it may be a good idea to explain the difference on the page. I don't understand what the motivation is for using the term "height" when we already have the descriptive and in-common-use term "complexity". --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

			::: Maybe that's naive, but I'd say, it's not obvious that complexity (in a more common sense) needs to be measured in one dimension. Height seems to be a one-dimensional measure. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 06:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)