Talk:Height: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:: Agreed. As far as I can tell, "height" and "complexity" are synonymous. If they're not, then it may be a good idea to explain the difference on the page. I don't understand what the motivation is for using the term "height" when we already have the descriptive and in-common-use term "complexity". --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC) | :: Agreed. As far as I can tell, "height" and "complexity" are synonymous. If they're not, then it may be a good idea to explain the difference on the page. I don't understand what the motivation is for using the term "height" when we already have the descriptive and in-common-use term "complexity". --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
::: Maybe that's naive, but I'd say, it's not obvious that complexity (in a more common sense) needs to be measured in one dimension. Height seems to be a one-dimensional measure. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 06:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:29, 12 April 2022
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Height is not dissonance
Not a big fan of this opening:
- The height is a tool to measure the dissonance of JI intervals.
It measures the complexity. This might be related to dissonance, but not in an obvious way.
-Sintel (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. As far as I can tell, "height" and "complexity" are synonymous. If they're not, then it may be a good idea to explain the difference on the page. I don't understand what the motivation is for using the term "height" when we already have the descriptive and in-common-use term "complexity". --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)