Talk:Rank-3 scale: Difference between revisions

Line 3:

I think [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Rank-3_scale&type=revision&diff=90417&oldid=90395 “generalizing” octave to equave] was not so valuable. It seems to complicate things, also because the [[equave]] article is not very informative besides telling us who ''coined'' the term. To us, it may be clear that the octave is the prototypical equave, but not to others. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

: I think most people with enough knowledge to dive into the theory of rank-3 scales should be familiar with or able to learn about equaves quickly enough. However, I agree that placing it up front might slow down comprehension. I~~'ll~~ add it in parentheses as an "extra" instead. Thank you for the feedback! --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 21:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

: I think most people with enough knowledge to dive into the theory of rank-3 scales should be familiar with or able to learn about equaves quickly enough. However, I agree that placing it up front might slow down comprehension. I could add it in parentheses as an "extra" instead, if that works better. Thank you for the feedback! --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 21:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:18, 26 March 2022 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,250 edits re ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:18, 26 March 2022 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,250 edits I didn't realize the change was already reverted, I'll wait before proceeding Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I think [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Rank-3_scale&type=revision&diff=90417&oldid=90395 “generalizing” octave to equave] was not so valuable. It seems to complicate things, also because the [[equave]] article is not very informative besides telling us who ''coined'' the term. To us, it may be clear that the octave is the prototypical equave, but not to others. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 16:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)		I think [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Rank-3_scale&type=revision&diff=90417&oldid=90395 “generalizing” octave to equave] was not so valuable. It seems to complicate things, also because the [[equave]] article is not very informative besides telling us who ''coined'' the term. To us, it may be clear that the octave is the prototypical equave, but not to others. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 16:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

	: I think most people with enough knowledge to dive into the theory of rank-3 scales should be familiar with or able to learn about equaves quickly enough. However, I agree that placing it up front might slow down comprehension. I~~'ll~~ add it in parentheses as an "extra" instead. Thank you for the feedback! --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 21:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)		: I think most people with enough knowledge to dive into the theory of rank-3 scales should be familiar with or able to learn about equaves quickly enough. However, I agree that placing it up front might slow down comprehension. I could add it in parentheses as an "extra" instead, if that works better. Thank you for the feedback! --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 21:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)