Tenney–Euclidean temperament measures: Difference between revisions
m Style |
Fix a few words |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Graham Breed's original definitions from his ''primerr.pdf'' paper tend to use the third definition, as do parts of his [http://x31eq.com/temper/ temperament finder], although other scaling and normalization methods are sometimes used as well. | Graham Breed's original definitions from his ''primerr.pdf'' paper tend to use the third definition, as do parts of his [http://x31eq.com/temper/ temperament finder], although other scaling and normalization methods are sometimes used as well. | ||
Note that the above is mainly for comparing temperaments within the same subgroup; when making | Note that the above is mainly for comparing temperaments within the same subgroup; when making intersubgroup comparisons, this can be more complicated. | ||
== TE complexity == | == TE complexity == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Below shows various definitions of TE complexity. All of them can be easily computed either from the multivector or from the mapping matrix, using the [[wikipedia: Gramian matrix|Gramian]]. | Below shows various definitions of TE complexity. All of them can be easily computed either from the multivector or from the mapping matrix, using the [[wikipedia: Gramian matrix|Gramian]]. | ||
Let's denote a weighted mapping matrix, whose rows are the weighted vals ''v<sub>i</sub>'', as V. The ''L''<sup>2</sup> norm is one of the standard measures | Let's denote a weighted mapping matrix, whose rows are the weighted vals ''v<sub>i</sub>'', as V. The ''L''<sup>2</sup> norm is one of the standard complexity measures: | ||
<math>\displaystyle | <math>\displaystyle | ||