Talk:Tenney–Euclidean tuning: Difference between revisions
Some notes on Frobenius tuning |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
-[[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 19:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC) | -[[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 19:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
: I'm not sure if the name Frobenius tuning is derived from Frobenius norm. | |||
: The next part may be explained more clearly, but I'd like to remind you "the same error across primes" itself is a bias towards higher primes. Notice if 2 and 7 are equally weighted, 8 would get about thrice the error of 7's (see Graham's primerr.pdf). And no, I haven't observed the bias towards lower primes due to the way temperaments are constructed. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 01:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC) | |||