Talk:Patent val/Properties: Difference between revisions
re |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::: I don't know. For fear of fragmentation? The two concepts are so closely related that it seems favorable to bundle them together. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC) | ::: I don't know. For fear of fragmentation? The two concepts are so closely related that it seems favorable to bundle them together. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::: I suppose. But if we branch RTT partially on a terminological basis and then Dave and I use "uniform map" on our branch, that would force a new page anyway because we think of things the opposite way, with "integer uniform maps" ("patent vals") being a specific type of "uniform maps" ("generalized patent vals"). This is as I proposed here: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Patent_val#alternative_proposal:_add_new_page_for_uniform_map. If we break the pages up, that changes the hierarchization so that it's not within a page but across a page, so that both ways of approaching the concept can be realized straightforwardly. Anyway, so perhaps we just revisit this issue once I send the survey out to the community about RTT branching and get the results back. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC) | |||