User:Arseniiv: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m move things around, add automatic subpage list |
m let’s be more transparent |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi there! | Hi there! | ||
For now I’m fairly new to xenharmony, so I’ll try to make my edits conservative. Feel free to write me in the discussion page! Also feel free to edit my grammar, as I’m not a native English speaker. | For now I’m fairly new to xenharmony, so I’ll try to make my edits conservative. Feel free to write me in the discussion page! Also feel free to edit my grammar a bit, as I’m not a native English speaker. | ||
On XA Discord, I’m 0.5°#6623. | |||
== Xenharmonic timbres! == | == Xenharmonic timbres! == | ||
Revision as of 20:52, 29 October 2021
Hi there!
For now I’m fairly new to xenharmony, so I’ll try to make my edits conservative. Feel free to write me in the discussion page! Also feel free to edit my grammar a bit, as I’m not a native English speaker.
On XA Discord, I’m 0.5°#6623.
Xenharmonic timbres!
So I finally took a small step and made two simple timbres which anyone (CC0) can use in a microtonal-able sampler like Sforzando or TX16Wx (hm no it doesn’t allow that, it seems) to try with non-5 or non-3.5 harmonies! They are at Freesound:
- 110Hz_minus5.flac — a timbre (almost) without multiples of 5, with fundamental of 110 Hz.
- 110Hz_minus3and5.flac — a timbre (almost) without multiples of 5 and 3. This was made from the previous and these multiples of 3 weren’t filtered out too much. But still there’s lot less of them.
Better look at descriptions right at the sample pages, they are a bit more verbose.
Feel free to write me something at the discussion page about them! I haven’t experimented myself yet what they could be good for, and would be very glad to hear anything.
Subpage stuff
- /Timbres — studies in regard to harmonic composition of timbres.
- Several subpages are template WIPs.