Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 496: | Line 496: | ||
:: One of the points of using odd tables is to ease inconsistent edos. With some edos with like a really off 3 but accurate 9, the odd table is likely to be helpful. With others the odd table is redundant. It depends on the edo. I propose a general guide: if error of prime 3 < 25%, show the prime table, otherwise odd table, or we may examine it case-by-case. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC) | :: One of the points of using odd tables is to ease inconsistent edos. With some edos with like a really off 3 but accurate 9, the odd table is likely to be helpful. With others the odd table is redundant. It depends on the edo. I propose a general guide: if error of prime 3 < 25%, show the prime table, otherwise odd table, or we may examine it case-by-case. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: Seconding re: inconsistent edos. My proposal: if there's no inconsistency in the odds table, use the prime table (showing primes up to 31). Otherwise use the odds table. | ::: Seconding re: inconsistent edos. My humble proposal: if there's no inconsistency in the odds table, use the prime table (showing primes up to 31). Otherwise use the odds table. | ||
::: Imo even when there's no inconsistency, I can still see the odds table being useful for showing at a glance how e.g. 31edo's 11/9 is really good. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 09:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC) | ::: Imo even when there's no inconsistency, I can still see the odds table being useful for showing at a glance how e.g. 31edo's 11/9 is really good. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 09:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC) | ||