Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 20:35, 4 July 2021 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,129 edits →EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos): new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:44, 12 July 2021 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,129 edits m →EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos): Fixed link to page TAMNAMS Newer edit →
Line 56:		Line 56:
	Since I am working on improving the page [[EDO]] and eventually other related pages, I'd like to know if that convention is reasonable. The reason I ask is because I noticed some recent changes on the wiki, notably setting [[19edo]] as a redirection to [[19-EDO]] with an edit sumamry mentioning arguments in favour of "EDO" over "edo". I am aware that this is an old debate, but I think choosing the most common spelling is the right direction. At the end of the day, the objective is only to have a consistent spelling on the Wiki, and after that anyone can use the spelling of their choice.		Since I am working on improving the page [[EDO]] and eventually other related pages, I'd like to know if that convention is reasonable. The reason I ask is because I noticed some recent changes on the wiki, notably setting [[19edo]] as a redirection to [[19-EDO]] with an edit sumamry mentioning arguments in favour of "EDO" over "edo". I am aware that this is an old debate, but I think choosing the most common spelling is the right direction. At the end of the day, the objective is only to have a consistent spelling on the Wiki, and after that anyone can use the spelling of their choice.

	Similarly, I would suggest "mos" instead of "MOS" for common usage on the Wiki, while preserving the main variants in strategic places like page intros. The page [TAMNAMS] is an example of a case where "mos" is used both as a standalone word and within new terms like mosstep. [[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 20:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)		Similarly, I would suggest "mos" instead of "MOS" for common usage on the Wiki, while preserving the main variants in strategic places like page intros. The page [[TAMNAMS]] is an example of a case where "mos" is used both as a standalone word and within new terms like mosstep. [[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 20:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)