Talk:103169edo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:04, 11 July 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Phone numbers: new section		Latest revision as of 15:05, 11 July 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary
Line 2:		Line 2:

	To me the value of the prime interval table decreases for such high EDOs. If these are of musical relevance at all, shouldn't we switch to scientific notation at some point? I don't think that anybody will be happy to count zeros. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)		To me the value of the prime interval table decreases for such high EDOs. If these are of musical relevance at all, shouldn't we switch to scientific notation at some point? I don't think that anybody will be happy to count zeros. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

			: For what it's worth, I do think that the prime interval table might be of musical relevance in terms of things like telicity due to its navigational uses. Regardless, I do like the idea of switching to scientific notation at some point. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)