User talk:Aura/Aura's Diatonic Scales: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:59, 13 March 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:02, 16 March 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits m →About minor thirds: +sidenote Newer edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	::: Well, if I ever get to 29-limit material, you've at least given me a good cause to look at it beyond the expected reasons. Still, I'm thinking that I perhaps need tweak some of my scales a little bit somehow- just to make it so that there are once again only three step sizes in the scale instead of like four or five. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)		::: Well, if I ever get to 29-limit material, you've at least given me a good cause to look at it beyond the expected reasons. Still, I'm thinking that I perhaps need tweak some of my scales a little bit somehow- just to make it so that there are once again only three step sizes in the scale instead of like four or five. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

			::: Sorry for disturbing, after picking up on the comment (''“fun fact”''), I wanted to know more: <code>([[29/16]])/([[77/64]]) = [[116/77]]</code> is about 709.4 cents in size. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)