34edo: Difference between revisions
m putting practical info above more technical info |
|||
| Line 637: | Line 637: | ||
* 34et has a lower relative error than any previous ETs in the 5-limit. The next ET that does better in this subgroup is 53. | * 34et has a lower relative error than any previous ETs in the 5-limit. The next ET that does better in this subgroup is 53. | ||
* 34et is most prominent in the 2.3.5.13.17 and 2.3.5.11.13.17 subgroups. The next ET that does better in these subgroups is 217 and 87, respectively. | * 34et is most prominent in the 2.3.5.13.17 and 2.3.5.11.13.17 subgroups. The next ET that does better in these subgroups is 217 and 87, respectively. | ||
== Tuning by ear == | |||
In principle, one can approximate 34edo by ear using only 5-limit intervals, using the fact that 17edo is very close to a circle of seventeen [[25/24]] chromatic semitones to within 1.5 cents, and using a pure 5/4 which is less than 2 cents off for the second chain. The overall tuning error, assuming everything is tuned perfectly, will be less than 3.5 cents, or a relative error of less than 10%. | |||
== 34edo and phi == | == 34edo and phi == | ||
| Line 852: | Line 855: | ||
| Superleap | | Superleap | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Listen == | == Listen == | ||