Template talk:Infobox ET: Difference between revisions
→Subgroup: re |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::: Sorry, Aura, that's a misunderstanding. It's not your fault. Not your idea makes the problem, but the vague parameters of the template. They outright call for discussion and dispute. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC) | :::: Sorry, Aura, that's a misunderstanding. It's not your fault. Not your idea makes the problem, but the vague parameters of the template. They outright call for discussion and dispute. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::: I can see why. Still, I can see both the "fifth type" and the "subgroup" parameters being useful if they are refined. The "fifth type" parameter should reflect the nature of the tempered fifth- though we admittedly need to discuss how to do this right- while the "subgroup" parameter (I think) should reflect the portions of the Harmonic Lattice that said EDO approximates to within 3.5 cents of error. I'll tell more about my thoughts concerning the fifth in the section on "fifth type" below. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
=== Fifth type === | === Fifth type === | ||