Talk:Kleisma: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:


:The septimal kleisma ([[225/224]]), and the septendecimal kleisma ([[256/255]]) for sure... I think there are others, but we would need to comb through lists of comma names to find them... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
:The septimal kleisma ([[225/224]]), and the septendecimal kleisma ([[256/255]]) for sure... I think there are others, but we would need to comb through lists of comma names to find them... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
:: Thanks so far. Now we can start the transformation. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:22, 25 November 2020

Disambiguation

One of them is 15625/15552. What else is called kleisma? --Xenwolf (talk) 09:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

The septimal kleisma (225/224), and the septendecimal kleisma (256/255) for sure... I think there are others, but we would need to comb through lists of comma names to find them... --Aura (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks so far. Now we can start the transformation. --Xenwolf (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)