Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
→Website for listening to intervals: I now stop spamming links here |
→Relations of various interval categories: "Just interval" is more appropriate, interval is too generic (also in other contexts) |
||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
:: Yeah I agree. AFAIU, no one here needs ratios by themselves, mathematically, so we would have a simple inclusion ''Just interval'' inside ''Interval'', taking both existing categories and reshuffling which page belongs where: rational intervals into ''Just interval'', and remaining few irrational intervals may reside directly in ''Interval'' without their own subcategory. (FTR [[:Category:Comma]] stays as it was.) Now we need more opinions! --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 18:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | :: Yeah I agree. AFAIU, no one here needs ratios by themselves, mathematically, so we would have a simple inclusion ''Just interval'' inside ''Interval'', taking both existing categories and reshuffling which page belongs where: rational intervals into ''Just interval'', and remaining few irrational intervals may reside directly in ''Interval'' without their own subcategory. (FTR [[:Category:Comma]] stays as it was.) Now we need more opinions! --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 18:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: I agree. I think [[:Category:Just interval]] is the best solution here (a more technical term would be something like <code>Category:Interval page</code>, but I prefer your - more pragmatic - solution). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Templates for wedgies, n-vals?.. == | == Templates for wedgies, n-vals?.. == | ||