Xenwolf
Joined 17 September 2018
No edit summary |
→Another Comma: BTW: you really should rethink your linking style: "this page" and "here" don't fit into written language. If in doubt, think about printing out this page |
||
| Line 338: | Line 338: | ||
:::: Examples of primary diatonic key signatures include C Major, G Major, G-Sharp Minor, B-Flat Minor, and so on. Examples of secondary diatonic key signatures include G-Demisharp Major, F-Demisharp Minor, B-Demiflat Major, and D-Demisharp Minor. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC) | :::: Examples of primary diatonic key signatures include C Major, G Major, G-Sharp Minor, B-Flat Minor, and so on. Examples of secondary diatonic key signatures include G-Demisharp Major, F-Demisharp Minor, B-Demiflat Major, and D-Demisharp Minor. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
So, does my definition of "navigational primes" as per [[User:Aura/Aura%27s_Ideas_on_Tonality#Navigational_Primes_and_Key_Signatures|this page]] make sense? If so, does my idea of calling 1771561/1769472 the"nexusma", or the "nexus comma" also make sense? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC) | So, does my definition of "navigational primes" as per [[User:Aura/Aura%27s_Ideas_on_Tonality#Navigational_Primes_and_Key_Signatures|this page]] make sense? If so, does my idea of calling 1771561/1769472 the "nexusma", or the "nexus comma" also make sense? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Yeah, that kind of makes sense. But I'm not fully convinced by the high priority you assign to 11 after 3. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC) | |||