Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
: How many glyph boxes will be needed? In the first approach, there was a maximum of two boxes (both of them optional): the first box holds a quartertone (or classic) accidental optionally combined with syntonic commas, the optional second box holds either septimal comma glyphs or darts. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC) | : How many glyph boxes will be needed? In the first approach, there was a maximum of two boxes (both of them optional): the first box holds a quartertone (or classic) accidental optionally combined with syntonic commas, the optional second box holds either septimal comma glyphs or darts. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: At present, I'm thinking there should probably be two- one to hold both the classic and quartertone accidentals, and one to hold accidentals which modify by combinations of the syntonic comma and the rastma. With the syntonic comma modifiers separated from the classic and quartertone accidentals | :: At present, I'm thinking there should probably be two- one to hold both the classic and quartertone accidentals, and one to hold accidentals which modify by combinations of the syntonic comma and the rastma. With the syntonic comma modifiers being simultaneously separated from the classic and quartertone accidentals and combined with the rastmic modifiers to form single glyphs, that renders a total of 25 different glyphs as opposed to the 45 in the first system. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC) |