User talk:CritDeathX: Difference between revisions

Line 334:

:::: I have to admit that one of my concerns is that if I don't use some variation of the mainstream quartertone accidentals for 33/32, then the 159-notation system won't be as accessible to microtonalists who got their start with [[24edo]] like me. Hmm... what if I set the two broad cross strokes of the demisharp accidental closer together than those of the sharp accidental while keeping the same traditional "demiflat" accidental? Of course, I'd have to do the same thing with the "sesquisharp" accidental and the "sesquiflat" accidental as those modify the base tone by an interval consisting of an apotome and a 33/32 quartertone... Does that sound like a good idea? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

:::: As a complement to this, I could also make a second set of quartertone accidentals based on the original quartertone accidentals as well, and the second "demisharp" and "sesquisharp" accidentals could have the two broad cross strokes set further apart than those of the sharp accidental, while the corresponding "demiflat" and "sesquiflat" accidentals see a stroke on their stems. The two "demisharp accidentals and the two "sesquisharp" accidentals could thus be distinguished by a "narrow" versus "wide" if the design is done right, with the "wide demisharp" and "wide sesquisharp" accidentals modify the base tone by an interval consisting of a 33/32 quartertone and a rastma... Is this also a good idea? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

:::: As a complement to this, I could also make a second set of quartertone accidentals based on the original quartertone accidentals as well, and the second "demisharp" and "sesquisharp" accidentals could have the two broad cross strokes set further apart than those of the sharp accidental, while the corresponding "demiflat" and "sesquiflat" accidentals see a stroke on their stems. The two "demisharp" accidentals and the two "sesquisharp" accidentals could thus be distinguished by a "narrow" versus "wide" if the design is done right, with the "wide demisharp" and "wide sesquisharp" accidentals modify the base tone by an interval consisting of a 33/32 quartertone and a rastma... Is this also a good idea? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:14, 10 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:14, 10 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 334:		Line 334:
	:::: I have to admit that one of my concerns is that if I don't use some variation of the mainstream quartertone accidentals for 33/32, then the 159-notation system won't be as accessible to microtonalists who got their start with [[24edo]] like me. Hmm... what if I set the two broad cross strokes of the demisharp accidental closer together than those of the sharp accidental while keeping the same traditional "demiflat" accidental? Of course, I'd have to do the same thing with the "sesquisharp" accidental and the "sesquiflat" accidental as those modify the base tone by an interval consisting of an apotome and a 33/32 quartertone... Does that sound like a good idea? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)		:::: I have to admit that one of my concerns is that if I don't use some variation of the mainstream quartertone accidentals for 33/32, then the 159-notation system won't be as accessible to microtonalists who got their start with [[24edo]] like me. Hmm... what if I set the two broad cross strokes of the demisharp accidental closer together than those of the sharp accidental while keeping the same traditional "demiflat" accidental? Of course, I'd have to do the same thing with the "sesquisharp" accidental and the "sesquiflat" accidental as those modify the base tone by an interval consisting of an apotome and a 33/32 quartertone... Does that sound like a good idea? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

	:::: As a complement to this, I could also make a second set of quartertone accidentals based on the original quartertone accidentals as well, and the second "demisharp" and "sesquisharp" accidentals could have the two broad cross strokes set further apart than those of the sharp accidental, while the corresponding "demiflat" and "sesquiflat" accidentals see a stroke on their stems. The two "demisharp accidentals and the two "sesquisharp" accidentals could thus be distinguished by a "narrow" versus "wide" if the design is done right, with the "wide demisharp" and "wide sesquisharp" accidentals modify the base tone by an interval consisting of a 33/32 quartertone and a rastma... Is this also a good idea? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)		:::: As a complement to this, I could also make a second set of quartertone accidentals based on the original quartertone accidentals as well, and the second "demisharp" and "sesquisharp" accidentals could have the two broad cross strokes set further apart than those of the sharp accidental, while the corresponding "demiflat" and "sesquiflat" accidentals see a stroke on their stems. The two "demisharp" accidentals and the two "sesquisharp" accidentals could thus be distinguished by a "narrow" versus "wide" if the design is done right, with the "wide demisharp" and "wide sesquisharp" accidentals modify the base tone by an interval consisting of a 33/32 quartertone and a rastma... Is this also a good idea? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)