CritDeathX
Joined 9 February 2020
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 331: | Line 331: | ||
::: You could have where a line strikes through the flat & have the lines layer for every 33/32 thing. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 01:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC) | ::: You could have where a line strikes through the flat & have the lines layer for every 33/32 thing. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 01:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::: I have to admit that one of my concerns is that if I don't use some variation of the mainstream quartertone accidentals for 33/32, then the 159-notation system won't be as accessible to microtonalists who got their start with [[24edo]] like me. Hmm... what if I set the angle at which the two broad cross strokes of the demisharp accidental closer together than those of the sharp accidental while keeping the same traditional "demiflat" accidental? Of course, I'd have to do the same thing with the "sesquisharp" accidental and the "sesquiflat" accidental as those modify the base tone by an interval consisting of an apotome and a 33/32 quartertone... Does that sound like a good idea? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC) | |||