User talk:CritDeathX: Difference between revisions

Line 329:

:: Hmm... Okay, so, as per the title of this section, I'm trying to develop a [[159edo_notation|notation system for 159edo]], and according to Kite, the fact that two [[33/32]] fall short of an apotome makes the idea of using mainstream quartertone accidentals for [[33/32]] counterintuitive, and yet, [[33/32]] is the simplest quartertone we have and thus the best JI candidate for the interval of "demisharp" or "demiflat", as I mentioned. I'm trying to find a way to make things work... I can't pretend the rastma will be tempered out if it isn't... so, how do I make things more intuitive? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 13:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

::: You could have where a line strikes through the flat & have the lines layer for every 33/32 thing. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 01:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:57, 8 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:58, 10 October 2020 view source CritDeathX (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 398 edits →Notation system for 159edo Newer edit →
Line 329:		Line 329:

	:: Hmm... Okay, so, as per the title of this section, I'm trying to develop a [[159edo_notation\|notation system for 159edo]], and according to Kite, the fact that two [[33/32]] fall short of an apotome makes the idea of using mainstream quartertone accidentals for [[33/32]] counterintuitive, and yet, [[33/32]] is the simplest quartertone we have and thus the best JI candidate for the interval of "demisharp" or "demiflat", as I mentioned. I'm trying to find a way to make things work... I can't pretend the rastma will be tempered out if it isn't... so, how do I make things more intuitive? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 13:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)		:: Hmm... Okay, so, as per the title of this section, I'm trying to develop a [[159edo_notation\|notation system for 159edo]], and according to Kite, the fact that two [[33/32]] fall short of an apotome makes the idea of using mainstream quartertone accidentals for [[33/32]] counterintuitive, and yet, [[33/32]] is the simplest quartertone we have and thus the best JI candidate for the interval of "demisharp" or "demiflat", as I mentioned. I'm trying to find a way to make things work... I can't pretend the rastma will be tempered out if it isn't... so, how do I make things more intuitive? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 13:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

			::: You could have where a line strikes through the flat & have the lines layer for every 33/32 thing. --[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 01:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)