Talk:5/4: Difference between revisions
→"classic" misleading: re and please do not consider the P.S. as too serious |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::::::: I think "diatonic" is great as opposite to "chromatic", but isn't this limited to distinguish unison and semitone as the origin of a given step-sized interval? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 15:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | ::::::: I think "diatonic" is great as opposite to "chromatic", but isn't this limited to distinguish unison and semitone as the origin of a given step-sized interval? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 15:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::::: <small>PS: Please don't apologize about your editing style, better invest in changing it. I, for example, often elaborate comments first in a different place and transfer them only when (if at all) I'm satisfied (especially if I'm expecting editing conflicts with co-commenters 😉).</small> | ::::::: <small>PS: Please don't apologize about your editing style, better invest in changing it. I, for example, often elaborate comments first in a different place and transfer them only when (if at all) I'm satisfied (especially if I'm expecting editing conflicts with co-commenters 😉).</small> | ||
:::::::: As far as I'm aware, "diatonic" can also contrasts with names for intervals with other scale types, such as "neapolitan" and "harmonic"- as per the more strict definition listed on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatonic_scale Wikipedias article on the Diatonic Scale]. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | |||