User talk:TallKite: Difference between revisions

Line 90:

Hey Kite, Xenwolf and I are currently trying to come up with a [[159edo_notation|notation system for 159edo]], and we're having to use portions of Ups and Downs notation for ease of access. However, as we're also using Helmholtz-Ellis symbols, mainstream quartertone accidentals, and symbols derived from both systems as anchors for reference, so the dart up and dart down- the basic symbols of Ups and Downs notation- need a stylistic upgrade to blend in with the traditional accidentals, and furthermore, the dart up and dart down need to be identical in all respects save for orientation. In addition to this, Ups and Downs notation becomes quite unwieldy for larger EDOs like 159edo, leading us to create new glyphs- like the double dart up and double dart down, as well as the triple dart up and triple dart down- simply to make the representation more compact and reduce the clutter that happens otherwise. I'm hoping you can help us out with this on the [[Talk:159edo_notation|relevant discussion page]]. Thanks. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

: Interesting. I will reply tomorrow. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 08:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:19, 5 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:41, 6 October 2020 view source TallKite (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Sysops 3,990 edits →Upgrades for Ups and Downs notation Newer edit →
Line 90:		Line 90:

	Hey Kite, Xenwolf and I are currently trying to come up with a [[159edo_notation\|notation system for 159edo]], and we're having to use portions of Ups and Downs notation for ease of access. However, as we're also using Helmholtz-Ellis symbols, mainstream quartertone accidentals, and symbols derived from both systems as anchors for reference, so the dart up and dart down- the basic symbols of Ups and Downs notation- need a stylistic upgrade to blend in with the traditional accidentals, and furthermore, the dart up and dart down need to be identical in all respects save for orientation. In addition to this, Ups and Downs notation becomes quite unwieldy for larger EDOs like 159edo, leading us to create new glyphs- like the double dart up and double dart down, as well as the triple dart up and triple dart down- simply to make the representation more compact and reduce the clutter that happens otherwise. I'm hoping you can help us out with this on the [[Talk:159edo_notation\|relevant discussion page]]. Thanks. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)		Hey Kite, Xenwolf and I are currently trying to come up with a [[159edo_notation\|notation system for 159edo]], and we're having to use portions of Ups and Downs notation for ease of access. However, as we're also using Helmholtz-Ellis symbols, mainstream quartertone accidentals, and symbols derived from both systems as anchors for reference, so the dart up and dart down- the basic symbols of Ups and Downs notation- need a stylistic upgrade to blend in with the traditional accidentals, and furthermore, the dart up and dart down need to be identical in all respects save for orientation. In addition to this, Ups and Downs notation becomes quite unwieldy for larger EDOs like 159edo, leading us to create new glyphs- like the double dart up and double dart down, as well as the triple dart up and triple dart down- simply to make the representation more compact and reduce the clutter that happens otherwise. I'm hoping you can help us out with this on the [[Talk:159edo_notation\|relevant discussion page]]. Thanks. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

			: Interesting. I will reply tomorrow. --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 08:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)