Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Line 233: Line 233:


:: As for what this is supposed to support, I'm looking to support things like different varieties of near-just diatonic scales, as well as near-just harmonic major scales, near-just harmonic minor scales, near-just melodic minor scales, and near-just neapolitan scales.  I'm also thinking of supporting of at least two proper 7-limit heptatonic scales with modes and derivatives using supermajor and subminor triads, and I'm also looking to support basic 11-limit music.  Basically, I'm trying to make high-order edos like 159edo more accessible to composers with a background in 12edo and 24edo.  Still, it's clear that this system needs some work. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
:: As for what this is supposed to support, I'm looking to support things like different varieties of near-just diatonic scales, as well as near-just harmonic major scales, near-just harmonic minor scales, near-just melodic minor scales, and near-just neapolitan scales.  I'm also thinking of supporting of at least two proper 7-limit heptatonic scales with modes and derivatives using supermajor and subminor triads, and I'm also looking to support basic 11-limit music.  Basically, I'm trying to make high-order edos like 159edo more accessible to composers with a background in 12edo and 24edo.  Still, it's clear that this system needs some work. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
::: It seems to me that you are searching for a basis (or superset) of actual tonal systems. Do you know [[205edo]], which builds the basis of the [[Hunt System]]? Maybe the theory webpages of the author could be of help for you. About the ticks: you maybe show only the set of accidentals - I searched for the 159 relation in that graph. So the tick distance seem to be <code>1\159</code>, right? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 08:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)