Xenwolf
Joined 17 September 2018
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
: It's hard for me to value this: I have little experiences with high-order EDOs (well, I already know that [[53edo]] (=[[159edo|159]]/3) has good approximations of 5-limit ratios). In the image, it's unclear to me where I am at a given tick. However, The idea of combining accidentals seems good to me, provided the (de)composition rules are simple and unambiguous. What about the "grammar" of this system: what kind of music (scales etc.) is this notation supposed to support? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC) | : It's hard for me to value this: I have little experiences with high-order EDOs (well, I already know that [[53edo]] (=[[159edo|159]]/3) has good approximations of 5-limit ratios). In the image, it's unclear to me where I am at a given tick. However, The idea of combining accidentals seems good to me, provided the (de)composition rules are simple and unambiguous. What about the "grammar" of this system: what kind of music (scales etc.) is this notation supposed to support? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Well, how should I make it easier for you to keep track of where you are at any given tick? | |||
:: As for what this is supposed to support, I'm looking to support things like different varieties of near-just diatonic scales, as well as near-just harmonic major scales, near-just harmonic minor scales, near-just melodic minor scales, and near-just neapolitan scales. I'm also thinking of supporting of at least two proper 7-limit heptatonic scales with modes and derivatives using supermajor and subminor triads, and I'm also looking to support basic 11-limit music. Basically, I'm trying to make high-order edos like 159edo more accessible to composers with a background in 12edo and 24edo. Still, it's clear that this system needs some work. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC) | |||