User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 227:

You should notice right away that I'm combining simple accidentals to create composite accidentals- at least this way there aren't so many simple accidentals to memorize, and you won't loose track of all the iterations of the Ups and Downs accidentals... Any thoughts? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

: It's hard for me to value this: I have little experiences with high-order EDOs (well, I already know that [[53edo]] (=[[159edo|159]]/3) has good approximations of 5-limit ratios). In the image, it's unclear to me where I am at a given tick. However, The idea of combining accidentals seems good to me, provided the (de)composition rules are simple and unambiguous. What about the "grammar" of this system: what kind of music (scales etc.) is this notation supposed to support? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:58, 2 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:42, 2 October 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Notation for 159edo: re Newer edit →
Line 227:		Line 227:

	You should notice right away that I'm combining simple accidentals to create composite accidentals- at least this way there aren't so many simple accidentals to memorize, and you won't loose track of all the iterations of the Ups and Downs accidentals... Any thoughts? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)		You should notice right away that I'm combining simple accidentals to create composite accidentals- at least this way there aren't so many simple accidentals to memorize, and you won't loose track of all the iterations of the Ups and Downs accidentals... Any thoughts? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

			: It's hard for me to value this: I have little experiences with high-order EDOs (well, I already know that [[53edo]] (=[[159edo\|159]]/3) has good approximations of 5-limit ratios). In the image, it's unclear to me where I am at a given tick. However, The idea of combining accidentals seems good to me, provided the (de)composition rules are simple and unambiguous. What about the "grammar" of this system: what kind of music (scales etc.) is this notation supposed to support? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 19:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)