Tenney–Euclidean temperament measures: Difference between revisions
m Link to JIP |
m Fix typos |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
\text{TE simple badness} = \text{TE complexity} \times \text{TE error} </math> | \text{TE simple badness} = \text{TE complexity} \times \text{TE error} </math> | ||
TE temperament measures have been extensively studied by [[Graham Breed]] (see [http://x31eq.com/temper/primerr.pdf | TE temperament measures have been extensively studied by [[Graham Breed]] (see [http://x31eq.com/temper/primerr.pdf ''Prime Based Error and Complexity Measures''], often referred to as ''primerr.pdf''), who also proposed [[Cangwu badness]], an important derived measure, which adds a free parameter to TE simple badness that enables one to specify a tradeoff between complexity and error. | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
# Taking an RMS | # Taking an RMS | ||
# Taking an RMS and also normalizing for the temperament rank | # Taking an RMS and also normalizing for the temperament rank | ||
# Any of the above and also dividing by the norm of the [[JIP]] (just | # Any of the above and also dividing by the norm of the [[JIP]] (just intonation points). | ||
Graham Breed's original definitions from his ''primerr.pdf'' paper tend to use the third definition, as do parts of his [http://x31eq.com/temper/ temperament finder], although other scaling and normalization methods are sometimes used as well. | Graham Breed's original definitions from his ''primerr.pdf'' paper tend to use the third definition, as do parts of his [http://x31eq.com/temper/ temperament finder], although other scaling and normalization methods are sometimes used as well. |