Aura
Joined 31 August 2020
→tri vs. tre: new section |
|||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
:: I think 50-cent steps would absolutely suffice, maybe even 100-cent steps. It's for the reason that you don't have to look up intervals or calculate from ratio. And furthermore you can see at a glance that it is a logarithmic diagram. This scale could as well have bigger and smaller ticks and maybe only some numbers like 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200 (if numbers at all). I'm currently not able to decide what would look best... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | :: I think 50-cent steps would absolutely suffice, maybe even 100-cent steps. It's for the reason that you don't have to look up intervals or calculate from ratio. And furthermore you can see at a glance that it is a logarithmic diagram. This scale could as well have bigger and smaller ticks and maybe only some numbers like 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200 (if numbers at all). I'm currently not able to decide what would look best... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
== tri vs. tre == | |||
The English ''one, two, three'' is ''uno, due, tre'' in Italian. Because classic music language is mostly (derived from) Italian, both is right. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | |||