Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Line 173: Line 173:


[[File:New_Diatonic_Function_Map.png]]
[[File:New_Diatonic_Function_Map.png]]
Very interesting graph. Thanks for sharing. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


== Names and function of 45/44, 55/54 and 33/32==
== Names and function of 45/44, 55/54 and 33/32==
Hey Xenwolf, I see in your recent creation of the 242/225 article that you said that 45/44 felt like an undecimal chroma to you.  You're not the first to say something to that effect, as I myself have called 45/44 the "greater undecimal parachroma" and 55/54 the "lesser undecimal parachroma".  That said, since we've also decided that 33/32 is somewhat similar in the sense of having chroma-like properties, and since a "parachroma" is an interval with properties akin to a chroma, only involving primes 7, 11, and thirteen, I think we need to give 33/32 a name that both reflects its parachromatic nature and sets it apart from both 45/44 and 55/54.  Do you have any ideas? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey Xenwolf, I see in your recent creation of the 242/225 article that you said that 45/44 felt like an undecimal chroma to you.  You're not the first to say something to that effect, as I myself have called 45/44 the "greater undecimal parachroma" and 55/54 the "lesser undecimal parachroma".  That said, since we've also decided that 33/32 is somewhat similar in the sense of having chroma-like properties, and since a "parachroma" is an interval with properties akin to a chroma, only involving primes 7, 11, and thirteen, I think we need to give 33/32 a name that both reflects its parachromatic nature and sets it apart from both 45/44 and 55/54.  Do you have any ideas? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)