CritDeathX

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 19:14, 12 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:15, 12 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 216:		Line 216:
	::::::: On the topic of otonal & utonal intervals, its possible that they need different ways of figuring out sonance, although its unclear to me how different we should treat them. --[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 19:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)		::::::: On the topic of otonal & utonal intervals, its possible that they need different ways of figuring out sonance, although its unclear to me how different we should treat them. --[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 19:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

	:::::::: Hmm... because the otonal and the utonal pitches are equivalent in terms of their consonance, and because otonal an utonal pitches are octave complements of one another, it seems that for this, intervals must be judged in pairs. Thus, since 5/3 and 6/5 are the octave complements of one another, and 5/3 has powers of two in the numerator, that means ''both'' 6/5 and 5/3 are disqualified.		:::::::: Hmm... because the otonal and the utonal pitches are equivalent in terms of their consonance, and because otonal and utonal pitches are octave complements of one another, it seems that for this, intervals must be judged in pairs. Thus, since 5/3 and 6/5 are the octave complements of one another, and 5/3 has powers of two in the numerator, that means ''both'' 6/5 and 5/3 are disqualified.