CritDeathX
Joined 9 February 2020
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) |
→Retuned piece: new section |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
: Ah, thank you for telling me about that! I'd assume that it would look nicer than what I have so far. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 21:40, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | : Ah, thank you for telling me about that! I'd assume that it would look nicer than what I have so far. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 21:40, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
: ''ps: id be happy to try and either retune a piece or make a piece to demonstrate that temperament if you would like'' | : ''ps: id be happy to try and either retune a piece or make a piece to demonstrate that temperament if you would like'' | ||
== Retuned piece == | |||
Hi CritDeathX, <br> | |||
It is quite intereating to hear [[:File:Thirteen Preludes No. 1, tuned to sam's 17-tone temperament.wav]], I'm not able to check the quality of the retuning but am impressed by the speed at which you can deliver this kind of stuff. Let me share a few thoughts about retuning of existing (classical, mostly 12-EDO) pieces in general: I doubt that this process can give us a really valid demonstration of the potential of a given tuning/temperament for two reasons: 1) The timbre will be unaffected and 2) the composition (kind of) "lives" in the 12-EDO world. As for the actual piece, I must admit that it's too fast for me as to value the tuning/temperament. <br> I hope my comments will not discourage you but instead help you in further exploring your [[User:CritDeathX/Sam's 17-note Well Temperament|17-note Well Temperament]]. <br> | |||
Best regards --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | |||