Talk:Extra-Diatonic Intervals: Difference between revisions
re +1 |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Your name preferences are very controversial and subjective. I'm not having a minor second without an augmented unison, as that seems very awkward. See [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 05:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC) | Your name preferences are very controversial and subjective. I'm not having a minor second without an augmented unison, as that seems very awkward. See [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 05:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
: Good point, also Tritone could be rephrased as augmented 4th or diminished 5th. But here we are still talking about ''classic'' diatonic intervals. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 10:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC) | : Good point, also Tritone could be rephrased as augmented 4th or diminished 5th. But here we are still talking about ''classic'' diatonic intervals. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 10:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
::What? Assuming ''classic'' means "coming from [[quarter comma meantone]]", a classic augmented unison is 76.049 cents, while a classic minor second is 117.108 cents, and [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals]] reflects this difference. I don't get your counter–point. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 15:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC) | |||