User talk:PiotrGrochowski: Difference between revisions

Line 105:

please don't try to push the <code><nowiki><ul><li></li></ul></nowiki></code> style into the wiki. The wiki idea is that you have to know few or - better - no markup for adding (or editing) content. This way it's really easy to see how the wiki text relates to the HTML output. You may even read the article without transforming it into HTML. Why do you prefer to embed HTML tags if it isn't necessary at all (MediaWiki transforms it into HTML automatically). Are you maybe using the visual editor? Best --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

: We just discussing the issue on Facebook, here I read - let me cite: '' "the proper, canonical syntax" on a wiki is wiki markup'' Jonathan Bright and ''One only breaks into HTML if there is no support for the markup, and lists are supported.'' Joe McMahon - all in all, there is not a single vote pro your preference. Please tell me what's your point. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:42, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

== I removed a partial addition ==

Hi Piotr,

you started adding a column in the page [[15edo-interval names]] which broke the table, that's why I removed it (I beg your understanding). Feel free to re-add a ''whole'' column, but for linking to background information (I'm talking about [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals|Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]), it would be better use a page in the main namespace (soon), so that also others feel invited to elaborate about your idea. Best --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

@@ Line 105: / Line 105: @@
 please don't try to push the <code><nowiki><ul><li></li></ul></nowiki></code> style into the wiki. The wiki idea is that you have to know few or - better - no markup for adding (or editing) content. This way it's really easy to see how the wiki text relates to the HTML output. You may even read the article without transforming it into HTML. Why do you prefer to embed HTML tags if it isn't necessary at all (MediaWiki transforms it into HTML automatically). Are you maybe using the visual editor? <br/> Best --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 : We just discussing the issue on Facebook, here I read - let me cite: '' "the proper, canonical syntax" on a wiki is wiki markup''<sup> Jonathan Bright</sup> and ''One only breaks into HTML if there is no support for the markup, and lists are supported.''<sup> Joe McMahon</sup> - all in all, there is not a single vote pro your preference. Please tell me what's your point. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:42, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
+== I removed a partial addition ==
+Hi Piotr, <br/>
+you started adding a column in the page [[15edo-interval names]] which broke the table, that's why I removed it (I beg your understanding). Feel free to re-add a ''whole'' column, but for linking to background information (I'm talking about [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals|Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]), it would be better use a page in the main namespace (soon), so that also others feel invited to elaborate about your idea. <br/> Best --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)